BGuthrie Photos: DC -- Downtown -- Third Church of Christ, Scientist (1600 K St NW)

DC -- Downtown -- Third Church of Christ, Scientist (1600 K St NW):

Bruce Guthrie Photos Home Page: [Click here] to go to Bruce Guthrie Photos home page.

Description of Pictures: The old building, the Brutalist architecture structure, had been demolished and the new one was going up. The church had begun to hate the old, inefficient building but preservationists fought the demolition for awhile.

Recognize anyone? If you recognize specific folks (or other stuff) and I haven't labeled them, please identify them for the world. Click the little pencil icon

underneath the file name (just above the picture). Spammers need not apply.

Copyrights: All pictures were taken by amateur photographer Bruce Guthrie (me!) who retains copyright on them. Free for non-commercial use with attribution. See the [Creative Commons] definition of what this means. "Photos (c) Bruce Guthrie" is fine for attribution. (Commercial use folks including AI scrapers can of course contact me.) Feel free to use in publications and pages with attribution but you don't have permission to sell the photos themselves. A free copy of any printed publication using any photographs is requested. Descriptive text, if any, is from a mixture of sources, quite frequently from signs at the location or from official web sites; copyrights, if any, are retained by their original owners.

Accessing as Spider: The system has identified your IP as being a spider.
IP Address: 18.117.81.240 -- Domain: Amazon Technologies
I love well-behaved spiders! They are, in fact, how most people find my site. Unfortunately, my network has a limited bandwidth and pictures take up bandwidth. Spiders ask for lots and lots of pages and chew up lots and lots of bandwidth which slows things down considerably for regular folk. To counter this, you'll see all the text on the page but the images are being suppressed. Also, some system options like merges are being blocked for you.
Note: Permission is NOT granted for spiders, robots, etc to use the site for AI-generation purposes. I'm sure you're thrilled by your ability to make revenue from my work but there's nothing in that for my human users or for me.
If you are in fact human, please email me at guthrie.bruce@gmail.com and I can check if your designation was made in error. Given your number of hits, that's unlikely but what the hell.

Help? The Medium (Email) links are for screen viewing and emailing. You'll want bigger sizes for printing. [Click here for additional help]

Share: Facebook Twitter Digg
[1] 3RDCSS_150125_02.JPG	[2] 3RDCSS_150125_13.JPG	[3] 3RDCSS_150125_28.JPG
[4] 3RDCSS_150125_33.JPG	[5] 3RDCSS_150125_36.JPG	[6] 3RDCSS_150125_43.JPG
[7] 3RDCSS_150125_50.JPG	[8] 3RDCSS_150125_69.JPG	[9] 3RDCSS_150801_04.JPG
[10] 3RDCSS_150801_08.JPG	[11] 3RDCSS_150801_13.JPG	[12] 3RDCSS_150801_17.JPG
[13] 3RDCSS_150801_19.JPG

Description of Subject Matter: We welcome you and hope to see you at church often! Third Church of Christ, Scientist, founded in 1918, is now one of six Christian Science churches in Washington, D.C. The current church building was designed by the firm I.M.Pei in 1971 as a project which included the 7-story Christian Science Monitor office building and the plaza area between.

This church is a branch of The Mother Church, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston, Ma. It is conveniently located two blocks north of the White House, near Farragut West and McPherson Square Metro stops.
The above was from http://3rdchristiansciencedc.com/

---

A Place Unfit for a Congregation, Much Less a Historic Designation

By Marc Fisher
Washington Post
Thursday, November 1, 2007; Page B01

Two blocks from the White House, there is a concrete fortress that looks like a top-secret government installation. Set back on a barren plaza frequented mainly by homeless men in search of a restroom, the building faces 16th Street NW with dirty, rough, blank walls. Amazingly, this building is a church -- probably the city's most unfriendly and depressing piece of spiritual architecture.

The District government proposes to declare this atrocity a historic landmark.

Never mind that the Third Church of Christ, Scientist, is only 36 years old, and its members never liked the design. Never mind that when it was built, then-Washington Post architecture critic Wolf von Eckardt called it "rude and disorderly," a brutal, uncivilized and inappropriate intrusion on the approach to the White House. Never mind that the Dupont Circle neighborhood commission recently voted unanimously to oppose historic status for the church. Never mind that Christian Science is a declining denomination that has cut its staff and budget by nearly half and is selling off some of its most valuable properties. Never mind that this downtown congregation's few dozen members want to raze the concrete pillbox and replace its 400-seat sanctuary with a new, more intimate home.

"It is always with reluctance, and fairly rarely, that we recommend a designation over an owner's objection," says a staff report from the city's Historic Preservation Office to be presented today to the preservation review board. But that's exactly what the city now proposes to do, freezing plans by a developer to create a mixed-use building that could include a small church for the Christian Scientists.

The city has kept this issue alive for nearly two decades and untold billable hours -- isn't this a fabulous town in which to be a lawyer? -- despite admitting in its own report that the building is an inflexible space and that there are "practical issues with condition and maintenance." Such as the fact that church members say it costs $8,000 to change a light bulb in the sanctuary because scaffolding must be erected.

The preservation report admits that the church plaza, as Eckardt predicted, "did prove a failure" in that nobody except the occasional homeless person ever uses it, and then mainly to urinate in the dark, narrow alley behind the building.
ad_icon

But hey, why should a building actually be usable if it can somehow be shoehorned into an esoteric, academic definition of a landmark?

The city staff calls the church "one of the best examples of Brutalism in the Washington area." That must be cheering to the souls who might wander into the church seeking spiritual uplift. Sorry for your pains, my good man, won't you enter our dark, forbidding chamber and soak in our Brutalism?

For those of us who may not be professional architects, Brutalism is "the use of exposed, unadorned, roughly cast concrete to construct buildings of 'stark forms and raw surfaces,' " the city report says with great admiration.

What the preservationists don't get is that the Christian Science complex -- there's also a small office building across the courtyard -- is a failure, a design flaw that begs to be blown to bits.

That doesn't make Washington a town of philistines with no place for modernist or mid-century design. I.M. Pei's East Wing of the National Gallery is both architecturally important and enormously popular. The District properly landmarked the Uline Arena, the sadly neglected concrete building in Northeast where the Beatles made their North American concert debut.

But what if the members of a church do not want to worship in a place that is "brooding, inward-looking," as former Post architecture critic Ben Forgey put it in a piece quoted favorably in the city report. What if they, as the church's lay leader, Darrow Kirkpatrick, says, "want the freedom to have a facility that best meets our needs and our sense of service"?

Shouldn't a church have the right to choose its own architectural message -- and how to spend its own money? "In this case, we don't feel the form follows the function," Kirkpatrick says. Most Christian Science churches are built either in the New England Congregational style (there's one on Massachusetts Avenue NW in American University Park) or in the Romanesque manner of the faith's Mother Church in Boston (like one on Euclid Street NW in Adams Morgan).

Nothing in Christian Science theology supports the idea of a church as a windowless fortress. And from the start, church records show, members wanted a "useful, practical building rather than a prestigious structure."

The preservationists who are rallying to save a church from its members are right to be concerned about a site two blocks from the White House. What goes there is the business not only of developers and their clients but also of anyone who cares about the city. If the church were replaced by a standard K Street box, that would indeed be a loss. But the answer is not to cling to a failure; rather, it is to seek something different, a bold new twist on the visual message of the approach to the president's house.

Alas, to preservation extremists, a city is not a living, evolving organism but a museum piece in need of being encased in government protection. No wonder they're so eager to save a bunker.
The above was from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103102768.html
Bigger photos? To save server space, the full-sized versions of these images have either not been loaded to the server or have been removed from the server. (Only some pages are loaded with full-sized images and those usually get removed after three months.) I still have them though. If you want me to email them to you, please send an email to guthrie.bruce@gmail.com and I can email them to you, or, depending on the number of images, just repost the page again will the full-sized images.
Connection Not Secure messages? Those warnings you get from your browser about this site not having secure connections worry some people. This means this site does not have SSL installed (the link is http:, not https:). That's bad if you're entering credit card numbers, passwords, or other personal information. But this site doesn't collect any personal information so SSL is not necessary. Life's good!
Photo Contact: [Email Bruce Guthrie].